"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, for so long, with so little, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing". Attributed to Konstantin Josef Jireček, it is likely a modern adaptation and does not appear in his documented works. I've seen it attributed to lots of different people so let's just go with this one for now.
Following the Chancellor's budget where just about everyone was made or are about to be made poorer I reflect on whether it is worth continuing the business? I guess that I wouldn't expect to see profits for a good few years and so, perhaps, it is academic but they've already shown scant regard for the people or for businesses and so it could and is likely to get worse. It's Socialism and they always spend lots of other people's money.
It's a day or two after the Budget and the US has been on Thanksgiving and so who knows what they'll make of it? The debt spiral isn't averted and the ever hungry public sector is perhaps the real Black Hole that they imagine is giving us problems. "And do tell me Chancellor, is this "black hole" in the room with us now?"
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised by all of this, the politics of envy has always been thus and those that voted for the Labour Party from historic reasons of "We've always voted Labour in this family/town etc" or from some sort of protest vote have found out what we knew all along. High Taxes, lies, broken promises and failure to tackle the areas that need it and dodge the Frog Eating that is required of brave government and ministers - they don't exist anymore and they look after themselves and their fellow trough eaters rather than those they are supposed to serve.
Things that have always failed in the past are repeated as if they will miraculously succeed this time. When I worked in Code Red situations it was always the lack of leadership, loss of project or financial control that appeared to blame (along with other mitigation stuff not implemented or thought about more likely). The one we see quite often is the spreadsheet project manager. Example:
It takes 500 men to build a road in 6 months - so it could be done with 3,000 in a month. Or we could get 9 women to have a baby in a month and so on. There are specific reasons that this cannot happen - biological in the latter case but in the former, you'd have too many people all together at once you cannot tarmac the road without the foundations and earth works having happened and there's the supervision and everyone getting in each others way. Not if you are the labour government. They can magic money and throw it at a problem and because of the woeful non business class politicians and civil servants the money may just as well be set on fire for all the good it will do.
Another example and one I have tackled a number of times is paying overtime to catch up or get a job done. Overtime was never priced into a job (or you wouldn't have won it) and so when you start paying one and a half or double the rate to get the same amount of work done you very quickly have a problem that you burn through your money and the job still isn't getting done faster or better as there's a sort of Laffer Curve with productivity and hours worked too - especially when people are working more than 40 hours a week and are beginning to get fatigued. The simplest mathematical calculations would demonstrate this but the trap is to fail to see that you are paying extra money for the same amount of work and the more you do that the quicker you run out of money.
Let's see what the markets make of it. From a business perspective, it disincentives me wanting to build it as they have increased taxes on success - the better I do the more money they take from me in stealth taxes. Is it worth it? No matter how elegant and leading edge my product is, the risks I have taken and the real struggle to get it to market you sometimes wonder "Why do I bother at all?"