For my sins I saw BBC news last night (small n) and was once again surprised by the "information" I was given about the California Fires. Dreadful thing and apparently it wasn't caused by wild fires it was caused by Climate Change because it's 1.5 degrees warmer in 2024! Yep, that's why folks. I'm a cynic as you probably know and sceptical about what we are being told and more importantly, how we are told.
If you told me wildfires are quite common in the Western USA I'd agree with you and right up that Pacific coast too. Generally it doesn't much matter if it is 1.5 degrees warmer when these things start and they don't start through a small rise in temperature there are factors involved like out of date infrastructure, electricity and water being two problems especially if you have overhead distribution that is many years out of date trying to run modern high energy things like electric cars, air conditioners and so on. If you don't implement fire breaks and you leave combustible materials lying around like scrub and autumn leaves in an area where wildfires are natural then you are providing fuel for fires. Sure you have the high winds and they are also well known and so what else could be the issue? It happens regularly not so bad as we have seen recently for sure but have we learned nothing? Is it beyond our ingenuity to tackle this or have we once more bent our knee to the great woke-ism of climate change, environmental pressure groups and other non scientific nonsense that passes as fact today?
So this chap shows us how 2024 has been the hottest year 'evar' in the last millennia or some such bollocks. So to demonstrate this post-industrial warming they changed the dates now to around 1850 from whatever it was a thousand or ten thousand years previous. So when the graph came up it didn't start in 1850 or indeed a thousand years ago because if it did it would show the Roman and Medieval warm periods both around 4 Degrees C more than now and the Little Ice Age too. The new graph didn't start until 1940 and guess what? The 1930s were the warmest period of the last 100 years and that would be inconvenient. It's all total bollocks and it just goes on and f*****g on and it's right in your face lying.
So another advert this morning talks about 10,000 tons of carbon saved this year. So is that Diamonds, Coal, Graphite or what? They probably mean CO2 but it could equally be CO1 I suppose. Ask Google about the different types of Carbon and it gives you a list of greenhouse gasses and not much about carbon at all?
I was watching how pathetic these people are in terms of their hubris, not only thinking that they can control the weather but that they actually think throwing trillions (yes trillions) at the problem and coming up with some sort of human scale solution is going to affect the planet somehow with all its built in self control mechanisms. It did a pretty good job without us and will probably continue to do so. No one is saying that we don't have an impact but you do really need to understand and comprehend the scale of things. Man has survived by adaption and that is the best way to approach any possible weather or climate Armageddon that we are being led to believe (for the past 50 or more years) that is coming down our way. Last night it was minus 17 degrees in the UK. Shouldn't that not ever happen at all with all this climate change nonsense? Surely we should be enjoying balmy winters, Mediterranean style summers and so on? That's the sort of weather we had in the Roman period and in the Medieval warm period. When they grew grapes as far north as Newcastle!
If you see this stuff, ask yourself why are they lying to you? Just go do some research and don't trust the search engines or similar, actually go and find scientific papers that explain what it is we are seeing. Look at Earth's passage through the Universe and around the sun and the affect of planetary gravity and wonder if these odd wobbles and elliptical anomalies taking you nearer or further from the sun (where the warmth actually comes from). Do these make any difference? Do clouds make any difference? They can't model these and why do we need models when we have data (manipulated as it is).
The last thing is that we are gambling on these computer spreadsheets being right. It's an all-in bet that we need to spend all this money to save the planet. Not even the models agree with each other and we used to have a saying about such models that if you put sh1t data in you'd get sh1t data out. I've seen hundreds of optimistic sales forecasts showing we're all going to be millionaires and not one of them, not one, has been right. You can only go with what you know and most things are a gamble but they are generally a calculated risk. We have career politicians who've never had a real job, have no scientific background and certainly no real management ability making decisions on shaky data affecting us all. So far it is costing every household £300 per year to GO GREEN. That cost is going up and there are no benefits, no one did a CBA at all on it. There's no ROI planned in and the first bunch of renewables can't be renewed just dumped into landfill. Very environmentally friendly.
When the adults return and take charge I hope they destroy these people who have just ruined our economy and lied to the populace for what? If they've lined their own pockest at our expense then they need to face charges too.
No comments:
Post a Comment